PDA

View Full Version : Moo3 now Q2 2002


MDA
08-01-2002, 21:21:46
according to the official website :cry: :shoot:

Sirius Black
08-01-2002, 22:47:36
Well, not really a surprise. Very ambitious game, and I expect they'd delay it at least once to get all the cinks out. Let's hope Infrogrames doesn't Civ3 it and force it out early.

Fistandantilus
09-01-2002, 00:53:18
I was expecting that too.
And I agree with Sirius, no need to rush the game. I can wait.

Shining1
09-01-2002, 03:24:53
Release dates R gay.

Nav
09-01-2002, 09:30:50
The bastards are having so much fun playing it, they can't be bothered to release it!!

Guy
09-01-2002, 13:32:13
I'm happy to see it delayed. Better that than rush a beta out and screw the fans.

Venom
09-01-2002, 13:33:18
A delay? For a computer game? Wow! What will this mean for the industry?

Resource Consumer
09-01-2002, 14:01:41
At least one less patch with luck...

MDA
09-01-2002, 21:49:49
It's already been delayed - but your point is good. A finished game is better than a beta.

DaShi
11-01-2002, 07:31:39
Originally posted by Nav
The bastards are having so much fun playing it, they can't be bothered to release it!!

Explains why CivIII was released early.

Aredhran
11-01-2002, 07:34:14
LMAO, good one DaShi :)

Shining1
12-01-2002, 00:33:35
Heh heh heh heh heh:D

Darkstar
12-01-2002, 11:38:35
That's not ACTUALLY a delay. I forget the game, but the back of it's manual listed MoO3 as a Q3 2002 game.

I saw something a short while back saying MoO3 would be Q1 2002.

If the site is saying Q2, sound like it's still on schedule to me. It would be a Q4 2002 or Q1 2003 that would be a REAL delay. Although initially, the Project lead *did* mention a Christmas 2002 or Christmas 2003 release, WAY back when they hung out at the MoO forum at SidGames.

MDA
12-01-2002, 17:33:55
there's a big moo3 ad on the back of the civ3 manual, Darkstar - but you couldn't remember where you saw it?:eek:

That was one of the only NEW, INNOVATIVE features of Civ3!
(OK, so I really like Civ3, but its so much fun to bash anyway, I'm not happy if I'm not bitching sometimes)

Darkstar
13-01-2002, 10:03:26
THAT explains it!

I only looked at the manual once. Didn't even OPEN it. ROTFLMAO. I had thought maybe it was the Civ3 manual, but I wasn't really sure.

Civ3 isn't a big horror story. I just don't think it should be called Civalization 3. Call To Power 3, maybe...