PDA

View Full Version : I don't like Civ 3 and you know why?


Vincent Fandango
18-12-2001, 12:45:09
well?

Funkodrom
18-12-2001, 12:47:07
Yes.

Vincent Fandango
18-12-2001, 12:48:29
because I got high,
because I got high,
because I got hi-igh
lalalalalala!

No, actually I don't get high.

Funkodrom
18-12-2001, 12:49:12
Maybe you'd like CivIII if you did?

Vincent Fandango
18-12-2001, 13:04:31
I'd probably eat the manual

Tizzy
18-12-2001, 13:04:41
Ah-ha, so THAT'S the answer!

Resource Consumer
18-12-2001, 13:06:57
Did you get CivIII

And building cities in the mountains is a bad idea because they grow too slowly.

Vincent Fandango
18-12-2001, 13:08:01
You can build cities?

Resource Consumer
18-12-2001, 13:11:31
No. I lied.

Darkstar
22-12-2001, 08:03:26
You cannot build cities on mountains.
You cannot irrigate hills (I guess Firaxis has decided terracing is just a fluke, and would never happen again...)

Civ3 and CtP2 are about on par... except CtP2 seems to be the better game. Other then it's AI which refuses to kill the human. That could be a design thing, though. Some people think a single player computer game is played for the HUMAN'S enjoyment. ;)

Vincent Fandango
22-12-2001, 09:47:06
I liked CtP better. It was more "simple"

Shining1
22-12-2001, 10:12:37
I've ignored CivIII. It's not new (not even any social engineering like in Alpha Centauri - that game at least contained innovations, even if it also had flaws), it's not better (still ICS and mass city management in the late game), and I just have too many other games to get around to finishing.

But I didn't get high, either.