PDA

View Full Version : Quake 3 or Unreal Tournament


PosterBoy
12-08-2002, 14:53:21
For the PS2

Which is better?


I just bought Unreal Tournament and that seems cool.

Venom
12-08-2002, 17:14:03
Not played either on the PS2, but I enjoy Unreal: Tournament more on the PC.

Shining1
13-08-2002, 03:56:03
From my limited experience, UT is way better. Bots that think well and it's less arcade looking too.

King_Ghidra@home
13-08-2002, 19:16:59
the pc UT is way better

FunkyFingers
13-08-2002, 20:39:10
I liked Quake3 on the pc for a while, but got bored of it eventually. It is extremely arcadey though and very fast, you don't really have to think. If you don't like the bots, play on line.

I've never played Unreal Tournament, but I did play Unreal, which I didn't like that much.

But hey, that's on the PC, I've not tried either on a PS2

MattHiggs
13-08-2002, 21:45:35
Quake 3 has the best engine for online gaming by far.

Sean
14-08-2002, 11:43:03
Quake 3 was pretty fun on the Dreamcast, and that is the sum of my console experience of those two.

Shining1
14-08-2002, 11:53:28
Matt: Pity it's such a crap game then:p

Sean
14-08-2002, 12:00:03
Sure, UT is great, if you like your gaming sterilised and homogenised.

Shining1
14-08-2002, 12:04:11
Sure, Quake is great, if your idea of intellgent bots is just opponents that get more accurate with the rail gun at higher levels.

Sean
14-08-2002, 12:04:53
Eh? They are multi-player games, Shining. You are supposed to play them with other people.

King_Ghidra
14-08-2002, 12:16:42
good luck playing multiplayer on your ps2 then

Sean
14-08-2002, 12:20:40
Well, I played four-player Quake 3 on the Dreamcast, so why not?

Shining1
14-08-2002, 12:31:58
Sean: Why does a QuakeIII server report its bots as 'players' then?:D

Damn beer.

FunkyFingers
15-08-2002, 08:35:33
I thought the Q3 bots were pretty impressive actually, more interesting to play against than most AI enemies in most FPS games.
Sony is launching it's online gaming kit later this year I understand.