PDA

View Full Version : Architectual thread about architecture & stoepit americans


mr_B
13-12-2011, 13:26:34
http://www.globalpost.com/sites/default/files/imagecache/gp3_small_article/twin_towers_the_cloud_12_13_11.jpg

http://www.globalpost.com/dispatches/news/regions/americas/united-states/twin-towers-911-attacks-world-trade-center-explosions-seoul-cloud

Funko
13-12-2011, 13:38:12
jj saw that earlier

it is stjoepit.

Fistandantilus
13-12-2011, 13:42:16
That 'could' hosts a hangar and a landing strip right?

Funko
13-12-2011, 13:44:34
So planes could "fly into the twin towers"?

Dyl Ulenspiegel
13-12-2011, 13:45:45
Must be the same people who always see Christ on toasts.

Although the project looks like some fungus growing out of the towers.

MDA
13-12-2011, 13:49:38
Looks like a cloud passing in front of two towers to me. Just so long as no one builds a bonfire on one of the terraces.

People that get angry about stuff like that need to find a nice distracting hobby.

Funko
13-12-2011, 13:55:49
Writing retarded rants online?

Cheshire Cat
13-12-2011, 14:17:15
people who always see Christ on toasts

HELLO CHRIST!

http://www.gadgetmadness.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/hello-kitty-toast-toaster.jpg

Venom
13-12-2011, 14:27:07
As I've read in other places, the architect admitted in other interviews that he was inspired by the attacks.

MDA
13-12-2011, 15:19:04
other places on the internet? :p

I guess it's a much different story if it was the architect's actual intent. Then again, they might just be dicks trying to draw attention to their business, not people that were actually happy to see thousands of men, women, and children killed. If that's the case, it's a terrible case of "too soon?" and we still shouldn't hire them but could cancel the face punching. :confused:

<insert long rant>

<"proof" 9-11 attack was even more transparently fake than Apollo 11>

Dyl Ulenspiegel
13-12-2011, 15:27:06
As I've read in other places

On the toilet or on that incredibly nerdy site?

Lurker
13-12-2011, 15:29:47
thread title is misleading. Should be "stjoepit architectural thread about stjoepit architecture."

Dyl Ulenspiegel
13-12-2011, 15:32:08
"by stjoepit architectje"

mr_B
13-12-2011, 15:44:23
inderdeedje