PDA

View Full Version : Civ 4 discussion thread


Funko
29-08-2007, 08:07:54
Continued from the "what have you been playing lately" thread. Discussion about whether or not to build the great wall.

Originally posted by Chris
I sometimes like to wait to build a barracks before I build a military unit, the wall protects me from roaming barbs in that case.

If you have time to build the great wall you certainly have time to build a barracks and a couple of units instead. :D

I just find it takes too much resources at a critical part of the game when I'm trying to expand quickly, it's not useful for very long and you can gain the same benefit from a handful of units plus I never have handy stone and some bastard AI beats me to it. If I had stone by my capital and I was industrious it'd be much more worthwhile.

Recently I've been trying a new strategy of early rushes to capture rival capital cities. Since they tend to be on really excellent city sites grabbing an early capital from a nearby neighbour can be awesome. You get a second fantastic production base and more space to expand into.

Tizzy
29-08-2007, 08:13:47
It also gives you Great Engineer points which are pretty useful. The other early wonders I tend to build end up in Great Prophets which are fine if I've managed to grab a religion but I'd rather have an engineer to grab another wonder.

Tizzy
29-08-2007, 08:14:16
(Plus it's got the best video :D)

Funko
29-08-2007, 08:17:21
You could just build a forge and assign an engineer to get engineer points.

The AI builds the Great Wall so early that you have to really beeline for it and I just want to be building units workers and settlers at that point (possibly monuments and/or barracks if I really have to).

Tizzy
29-08-2007, 08:25:01
At that stage I generally don't want to be assigning people, I want workers on tiles. I only use specialists early on if I've got eg loads and loads of food but no production.

Funko
29-08-2007, 08:38:42
I think running an Engineer specialist is as good as working a normal mined hill + great engineer points.

Nav
29-08-2007, 09:29:24
Has anyone tried the Final Frontier mod yet? Very impressed by the amount of work that's gone into it. Kind of a GalCiv-lite without the random events.

The opening stages are quite slow with solar systems quite far apart and ships only have 1 (max 2) movement.

You can build on different planets within a solar system as well as being able to extend the population limit with Habitation modules.

Resources are usually too far away from systems to fall within a colony's influence so you can build starbases (50? defence, build a missile every 15 or so turns) to extend it. Resources improve production speeds for certain unit types rather than being a requirement.

Still only mid-game but it looks like there could be a good tactical battle element later on with carriers and squadrons etc.

Funko
29-08-2007, 09:59:02
I haven't tried any of the mods, I still haven't fully got to grips with the normal game yet. :)

Plus... I really should play GalCiv at some point.

Chris
29-08-2007, 11:41:46
Originally posted by Funko
Continued from the "what have you been playing lately" thread. Discussion about whether or not to build the great wall.



If you have time to build the great wall you certainly have time to build a barracks and a couple of units instead. :D

I just find it takes too much resources at a critical part of the game when I'm trying to expand quickly, it's not useful for very long and you can gain the same benefit from a handful of units plus I never have handy stone and some bastard AI beats me to it. If I had stone by my capital and I was industrious it'd be much more worthwhile.

Recently I've been trying a new strategy of early rushes to capture rival capital cities. Since they tend to be on really excellent city sites grabbing an early capital from a nearby neighbour can be awesome. You get a second fantastic production base and more space to expand into. GW is easy to get and depending on your race and stone, somewhat fast to build.

I never tried an early war with anyone, the AI seems to build units a lot faster then I can so I try to avoid war until at least the Middle Ages.

Funko
29-08-2007, 11:50:28
Yeah, you have to be quite close, get lucky with early copper and brutally deforest and whip your cities to breaking point.

Chris
29-08-2007, 12:03:36
Have a favorite civ out of the new ones?

I really liked Portugal and Holland as well as the Byzantines.

Funko
29-08-2007, 12:07:21
I normally play random leaders and I haven't got any of the new ones yet. :(

Chris
29-08-2007, 12:15:25
Why random?

I play random for the AI, but I tried almost all of them, still have to try Kmer and ethiopia.

I also tried an all European civ game which was interesting (I played as the Celts under Boudeca) and had a great war with France, took all their cities but one, and made them a vassel.

Chris
29-08-2007, 12:16:13
The Celts are great BTW, not for their lame assed unit, but becuase when you upgrade you get that unit's special promotions which are really cool.

Funko
29-08-2007, 12:29:44
I like random because it makes me try leaders who I otherwise would ignore because I didn't like something about them.

Plus, I'm lazy and can't be bothered to pick one. :)

Nav
29-08-2007, 13:48:19
As I said in the other thread I played as the Netherlands recently, really like their special unit the East Indiaman (extra 2 strength compared to galleon) really helped dominate the seas early on.

The new continent options rock, the ability to control size, shape and quantity are cool.

Are tactical nukes a new unit since Civ4 vanilla? I do like a big explosion, have even fired one at my own territory in desperation!

Funko
29-08-2007, 13:52:03
They are new to this expansion I think. I've never fired a nuke in Civ 4.

C.G.B. Spender
29-08-2007, 14:05:57
And I was so proud of my most nerdish D&D thread!

Nav
29-08-2007, 14:27:32
Worth it for the brilliant animation alone!

I fired about 6 ICBM's, and 3 tacticals in my last game as the Netherlands (basically I was losing), was on a smaller slightly poorer continent then a couple of rivals who both decided to surprise war dec me and attack at almost the same time. However i think it just made them angrier...

Tizzy
29-08-2007, 14:49:24
The last "nukes" I fired were Planet Busters...


I keep intending to have a nuclear war game but always get distracted along the way and end up doing something else. Maybe next time

Funko
29-08-2007, 14:53:10
Wouldn't you prefer a nice game of chess?

Tizzy
29-08-2007, 14:54:28
Where's the violence in that?
Unless you mean wizard chess

Funko
29-08-2007, 14:56:48
Tic Tac Toe?

Tizzy
29-08-2007, 14:58:03
Boring

MDA
29-08-2007, 14:58:56
doh, cross-posted

Chris
29-08-2007, 15:54:11
I have used nukes, they don't completely wipe out units on the first shot, but they will with the second!

I also forgot to mention the new spaceship victory, they went back to civ 2 and you don't win until the ship arrives, not at launch.

Tac nukes are new to this expansion.

Nav
30-08-2007, 10:32:45
I was being plagued by a powerful Incan navy so tac nukes were really useful for dealing with that (cheaper and more effective than building battleships to beat said navy).

Interestingly in that game one of the random events came up with a challenge to build a powerful navy taskforce 4 destroyers, 2 battleships, 2 carriers + planes, and pit it against a city for some kind of reward. Was novel enough to take my focus away from defence and build said navy only to be mass invaded!

Chris
30-08-2007, 11:26:50
I've gotten that event once, but I don't remember what the reward was.

So far the best event I have seen was thge build colloseum one, that made their influenece much higher.

Chris
30-08-2007, 14:12:40
My beyound the sword review can be found here. (http://www.killerbetties.com/civilization_iv_beyond_the_sword_review_pc)

DaShi
30-08-2007, 22:01:47
I got a build 10 swordsmen event in my last game. Since I had no iron and none in sight, I pretty much ignored it. But it was a nice change from the 10 swordsmen barbarians appear next to your least defended city and raze it events.

Chris
31-08-2007, 10:24:49
Can't get that event if you have the great wall.

Funko
31-08-2007, 10:38:32
Now that is a good reason to get the great wall. :D

Nav
31-08-2007, 10:52:01
One of my most common mistakes at the start of the game is to rush city building and over-extend myself so barbarians appear and raze a couple of cities, before I have defenses properly in place. Bastards!

Funko
31-08-2007, 11:12:10
On the other hand, the more land you light up with your cultural borders the fewer barbarians appear.

Tizzy
31-08-2007, 11:27:38
Culture = good
Taking over cities by having lots of culture = great
However, creative victory = a bit boring

Funko
31-08-2007, 11:32:32
Creative is one of the best traits, that's for sure.

C.G.B. Spender
31-08-2007, 11:43:13
I got a Creative mp3-player!

Chris
31-08-2007, 14:47:11
I had a game as Portugal where my Culture overloaded the nearby Russians and 7 of their cities flipped during the game.

Tizzy
31-08-2007, 15:05:44
I love it when that happens.
Also getting an early great artist and culture bombing a border city so you flip several enemy cities in one go.

I wanna play now.

Chris
31-08-2007, 15:53:19
I have been saving an artist now as the artist makes the best corporation, the jewelers, whcih is the ONLY corp that makes money.

Greg W
05-09-2007, 10:02:33
Well, finally got the new expansion and played around with it a bit as the Greeks. :brwncard:

Now, taking into account that I didn't play the original all that much, and didn't play Warlords at all in fact, I'm not noticing major differences really. Just tweaks, more units and wonders and a couple of techs.

Having said that, I haven't played around with Spies yet, which I should get around to doing.

Funko
01-10-2007, 10:51:22
The spying thing is quite a big difference. If you fall too far behind in passive spying some of your competitors fall off the various graphs in the informations section and if you get far enough ahead you can see what they are researching.

maroule
01-10-2007, 13:01:54
finished my first big campaign on BTW yesterday, on "immense" map (world map), 10 civ, playing the Inca on Monarch, won the space race. I had tried Ethiopia as my first, on Europe map, and lost, comprehensively beaten by Carthage.

THe tweaks are great. I don't use the corporations that much because I often choose Nationalised economy (whatever the exact title of that civic) to keep the city costs down, but they look very interesting for the late game, depending on your available ressources of course. The new units are cool, and so are the new leaders (trying Justinian next). I have yet to try the mods, the fall from heaven (heroic scfi) is getting very good reviews here.

I think Monarch is my natural level, as I'm challenged to win a game there. Prince is a walkover, but Emperor (is that the one above Monarch) looks unfeasible: had a try once and was totally off the pace of my rivals even before 0 AD. I have to consolidate my game, my cities are still pretty much jack of all trades, while I should have them clearly separated by function (military, great men, financial, etc.). I also normally take a lot of risks by being fairly light on the military side at the start, building up only later on. When sharing a continent with Roosevelt or Gandhi, that's fine, but Moctezuma, Genghis and Boudicea (the bitch) are less forgiving.

Funko
12-10-2007, 10:40:34
Just started intermediate game 2 of the BtS tri league tournament. It actually seems like quite a cool idea, and without giving anything away, the start of this game certainly makes for an interesting game!

http://apolyton.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?s=&forumid=325

Chris
12-10-2007, 14:13:31
How gay of you.

Funko
12-10-2007, 15:15:55
It's actually a very interesting game, apparently the first one was too.

Venom
12-10-2007, 15:35:27
I lost my Civ IV install disk. :(

maroule
12-10-2007, 15:55:24
Originally posted by Funko
Just started intermediate game 2 of the BtS tri league tournament. It actually seems like quite a cool idea, and without giving anything away, the start of this game certainly makes for an interesting game!

http://apolyton.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?s=&forumid=325

do give away, I need a strong incentive to go through the bore of reading the stuff and starting the game

Funko
12-10-2007, 16:05:26
It genuinely would give stuff away... and I haven't played for very long but I played sufficiently long that I had to send the guy who made the scenario a message saying he had a sick sense of humour!

Fistandantilus
12-10-2007, 16:10:13
it sounds as hard as hell

Funko
12-10-2007, 16:17:50
I think I'm going to get my arse handed to me. I've never played raging barbs and I'm used to playing on epic or marathon.

Funko
12-10-2007, 16:24:00
That's kind of why I like it, it's getting me to play games outside my comfort zone.

Chris
14-10-2007, 15:05:54
Originally posted by Venom
I lost my Civ IV install disk. :( I laugh at your misfortune.