PDA

View Full Version : Question


Colon
12-12-2006, 12:09:48
Well?

mr_G
12-12-2006, 12:10:58
50/50

Colon
12-12-2006, 12:11:55
This (http://www.counterglow.com/forum/showthread.php?s=&threadid=36795) and this (http://www.counterglow.com/forum/showthread.php?s=&threadid=36794) will help make up your mind.

Colon
12-12-2006, 12:12:33
Dammit HASSSELT squandered an early lead.

mr_G
12-12-2006, 12:13:35
losertje

Colon
12-12-2006, 12:14:04
Who laughs last, laughs best.

Funko
12-12-2006, 12:14:35
Why isn't this a multi choice poll?

Colon
12-12-2006, 12:16:03
Because the possible answers are mutually exclusive.

mr_G
12-12-2006, 12:16:39
Originally posted by Colon
Who laughs last, laughs best. the little curly cow is from the dam.

Colon
12-12-2006, 12:18:38
Rotterdamit, HASSELH is now commanding a massive lead.

mr_G
12-12-2006, 12:23:34
one swallow makes no summer Colonneke

Drekkus
12-12-2006, 12:25:59
Hasselh becomes Assel in Antwerp.

Tizzy
12-12-2006, 12:26:16
Originally posted by Colon
Because the possible answers are mutually exclusive.

no they're not, HASSELTHASSLEH is a perfectly acceptable answer.

mr_G
12-12-2006, 12:29:17
Originally posted by Drekkus
Hasselh becomes Assel in Antwerp. and now i hear a conversation between drekkus and swast :lol:

Colon
12-12-2006, 12:30:24
Amsterdamit! It's my thread and I say they're mutually exclusiefje.

mr_G
12-12-2006, 12:33:18
EIGEN THREAD EERST!!!!!!

Colon
12-12-2006, 12:36:09
HASSSIST!

Tizzy
12-12-2006, 12:38:41
You may have created the thread but you don't know everything about the thread.

Drekkus
12-12-2006, 12:39:32
Da ha wal hoet koomen zekerrr

mr_G
12-12-2006, 12:41:19
Originally posted by Colon
HASSSIST! :lol:
alleeej colon, gij komt van Antwaarp
das gemeengoed daarro

Venom
12-12-2006, 12:53:14
Originally posted by Colon
Because the possible answers are mutually exclusive.

Nothing is mutually exclusive if you use a big enough hammer.

Colon
13-12-2006, 07:08:43
And... HASSSELT has regained its former leading position!

King_Ghidra
13-12-2006, 09:36:28
Why no HASSELBAINK?